The Courage Not to Prosecute?
Lt. Col. V. Stuart Couch seemed like a great choice to prosecute Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a Guantanamo Bay prisoner believed to be connected to the 9/11 attack.
Col. Couch, a Marine Corps pilot and veteran prosecutor, lost a close friend in the attack. Former Marine Michael “Rocks” Horrocks was the copilot on the second plane to strike the World Trade Center in 2001.
An al Quaeda member said Slahi was involved in the recruitment of those who committed the 9/11 attack.
The other evidence against Slahi consisted of his own statements.
But after nine months of preparation, Col. Couch, 41, declined to prosecute Slahi.
The reason, detailed in a full-page account in the Wall Street Journal: Col Couch concluded that Slahi’s confession came as the result of torture — beatings and death threats — and was therefore inadmissible under both U.S. and international law.
According to Bill Wilder, director of educational ministries at the Center for Christian Study in Charlottesville, Va., Couch “...wanted to be a good soldier and yet on the other hand felt his duty to his God to be the greatest duty that he had.”
It was Couch’s belief that, according to Wilder, “...human beings are created in the image of God and as a result we owe them a certain amount of dignity.”
Slahi, 37, remains in Guantanamo. Col. Couch finished his three-year term as a prosecutor and took on a new assignment as a judge on the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals. He says he continues to hope for “some nontainted evidence” to bring Slahi to justice.
Upon leaving his prosecutor post, Col. Couch received the Defense Meritorious Service Medal and a citation that referred to his “moral courage.”
Do we praise Col. Couch for that moral courage, or condemn him for failing to prosecute an alleged 9/11 conspirator?